Every fall at Auburn, I’ve had my Composition I students write an essay in which they examine their family stories in order to develop an argument about why such stories are told. Some of the most perceptive essays I’ve read have concentrated on stories in which the authors’ parents described what the authors were like as children, and many argued that families tell such stories to show us what our tendencies are — especially our tendencies towards bad behavior (and especially bad behavior in public places) — and how to combat and/or correct them.
This argument is certainly supported by my own experience. The story my parents most often tell about my childhood involves a nasty incident at a putt-putt course in Panama City, Florida, during which I displayed A Very Bad Attitude towards miniature golf (a side note: somehow, I even managed to find a postcard on the Internet featuring this particular putt-putt course’s most famous feature: a giant and terrifying Tyrannosaurus Rex, who still haunts me in my dreams). A second side note, this one non-parenthetical and necessary for understanding the following story: Emma does not do miniature golf. Emma does not do miniature golf for a reason. And that reason is a very important reason: because she is inherently awful at anything that a.) is even vaguely athletic or b.) involves hand-eye co-ordination. Putt-putt, of course, involves both, and I am, in a word, terrible at it. Shamefully, shamefully terrible.
Nonetheless, during a vacation to Panama City when I was five or six, I found myself on a Putt-Putt course with my parents. Needless to say, things did not go well. Though the details of the story and of my memory are hazy, based on subsequent putt-putt experiences, I assume that it took at least fifteen tries to get the ball through the grinning clown’s mouth, and twenty to even get near the windmill. It might, in fact, have been the windmill that pushed me over the edge and ignited my five-year-old rage. Regardless of what hole it was, I realized that things were not going well, and my Very Bad Attitude emerged in full force. I threw the ball. I threw down my club. I threw a fit, and refused to play even one more half-second of putt-putt.
But then I looked up from where I was — which was (again, shamefully) probably throwing a fit on the Astroturf in front of the windmill — and I saw my father’s face. My father, who is rarely moved to anger, was far, far from pleased. He would not have me be a bad sport, and he would not have me be a sore loser. And so he made me pick up the ball, and the club, and walk the seemingly eternal distance to the next hole, where I would try and try and try again to get the ball past the crouching gorilla and up the hill.
And I’m very glad that he did. I mention this story because I think it’s key to what it takes to be a writer: not giving into the desire to scream, throw down your pen and paper or even your laptop, and give up. One of the most important — if not the most important — things for me, as a writer, has been persistence, finding a way to play through when it seems like I’m losing every hole, when the rejection slips pile up in the mailbox and the poems themselves just aren’t behaving. And I think that this was most essential for me during NaPoWriMo. It seems miraculous now, but I managed to make it all the way through NaPoWriMo for two years in a row — thirty days, thirty poems. The process was not without its frustrations, its humiliations, its moments where I wanted to throw everything I’ve written away and walk away from the game. But, largely thanks to the support of my fabulous NaPoWriMo partner, I made it through, and I’m glad I played every hole. Being that deeply connected to my creative process for that long was agonizing and exhausting, but I learned a great deal. Perhaps more than anything, I learned a lot about my habits — for instance, that, as a friend of mine once told me after a poetry reading, I sure do like lists. I learned that it’s sometimes essential to avoid giving in to this habit, and sometimes essential that I do give in. I learned that I do have the tendency to write the same poem over and over, but that I often need to do so, if only to get a subject out of my bloodstream.
And, perhaps most importantly, I learned how important community is in this often-solitary endeavor, and what a blessing it is to not work entirely in isolation. My partner and I are even planning another month-long writing adventure. So spinning windmill, prepare yourself! I’m coming back to the course!

Emma Bolden is the author of How To Recognize A Lady, a chapbook of poems published as part of Edge by Edge, the third in Toadlily Press' Quartet Series, and The Mariner's Wife, a chapbook published by Finishing Line Press. Her third chapbook, The Sad Epistles, is forthcoming from Dancing Girl Press. She was the recipient of a Tennessee Williams Scholarship to the Sewanee Writers' Conference and was named a Finalist for a Ruth Lilly Fellowship by the Poetry Foundation/Poetry magazine. Her work has been published or is forthcoming in such journals as Prairie Schooner, the Indiana Review, Feminist Studies, The Journal, Redivider, The Greensboro Review, and Verse. Her manuscript was a semi-finalist for the Perugia Press Prize. She is a Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Georgetown College, where she also serves as the poetry editor of the Georgetown Review.



5 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 12, 2008 at 1:18 pm
mariegauthier
Re: writing the same poem over & over — I think it’s a symptom of feeling, consciously or unconsciously, as though you haven’t found the exactly right expression of the poem’s essence, this isn’t what you’re tying to say, it’s not there yet, so you keep trying. My hope is always that the all the poems will ultimately be successful on their own terms, and each have something unique to offer, even if their themes are similar.
Re: NaPoWriMo — bravo! You’re a braver woman than I, Emma Bolden!
May 12, 2008 at 1:22 pm
emmabolden
This is what I hope, too. Though I must admit that I came to a point during NaPoWriMo where I suddenly realized that I’d written four versions of the same poem, and the first three versions simply had to go visit the trash can, save a few scattered words and phrases. Perhaps it’s writing the poems so close together that caused this — or, else, caused me to SEE this.
Braver, or less sane — it’s unclear which.
May 14, 2008 at 1:01 pm
jessiecarty
Great post
I so regret the years I tried to walk away from writing. I had (here would have been my essay) a bad experience while trying out for cheerleading in 6th grade (why was I doing this when I was also non-athletic?) and the teacher in charge singled me out–long store–basically it made me feel it was ok not to try things because those in charge were just going to laugh at me. I think I am over that but when those rejection slips comes, I think of that still.
Amazing what haunts you.
Here is my depressing comment but really your post boosted me up and I still want to try putt Putt because no one has ever taken me
May 19, 2008 at 1:24 am
emmabolden
Oh, no. That’s a terrible story. Why do teachers have to be so cruel?! I think you should be very proud that you DO still try for things, after that.
If I’m ever up your way, we’ll totally play Putt-Putt together. Though you’ve been warned to watch out for flying clubs.
May 21, 2008 at 2:59 pm
jessiecarty
We will totally have to Putt Putt
I bet I could use a kiddie club..hmmm