From time to time, my World Literature students give me a hard time for saying that every week is my favorite week. Around this time of the semester, I start to see their point. After already asserting that Hedda Gabler is my Absolute Favorite Thing to Teach, Ever, Seriously, I come to this week: Whitman and Dickinson, the two Absolutes, the godparents of American poetry, and, also, my Absolute Favorite Thing to Teach, Ever, Seriously.
Tomorrow, in my class, we’re going over Song of Myself. I guest-taught Dickinson in the lovely and incredibly talented Chantel Acevedo’s class this morning, in exchange for her wonderful lecture on Japan during my class’ discussion of The Narrow Road Through the Backcountry (our translator’s take — I am much more devoted to the title The Narrow Road to the Interior, as translated by Sam Hamill). It was a dry run for my own class on Thursday. We spent a lot of time discussing the myth of Emily Dickinson (for a brief lesson on this, please take a look at a real photo of Dickinson versus the doctored, feminized version they used for her books, complete with decidedly un-Dickinson ruffled collar and curls) and how even their anthology perpetuates this myth. And perpetuate it it does — as well as insulting her abilities as a poet. Chantel and I both use the Bedford Anthology of World Literature. I love the Bedford. I recommend the Bedford. I appreciate the Bedford’s translations of Japanese literature. But the Bedford’s gloss on one of Dickinson’s poems made me so furiously angry that I’m thinking of lodging a complaint. It reads, and I quote:
“Perhaps the most moving of Dickinson’s poems are those in which the metaphors go astray, poems whose direction seems to escape the determination of the poet.”
As if Dickinson doesn’t know what she’s doing, as if any brilliance is purely accidental, which is such a traditional, outdated, and clearly sexist view of women’s poetry that the editors should be ashamed of themselves. This melds exactly with Alicia Suskin Ostriker’s description of attitudes towards female poetry in Stealing the Language, one of the few books that I can say, without exaggeration, completely changed the direction of my work and my thinking about poetry (read it! read it!). And what poem is this, which escaped Dickinson’s control? “[My Life had stood -- a Loaded Gun --]” — one of the most deliberate and controlled poems in the English language. Perhaps the editors of the anthology should read Rich’s “Vesuvius at Home: The Power of Emily Dickinson” and then go sit in the corner for a time-out to think about what they’ve done.
In other news, you know that you work at a major football school when what worries you is not that someone drew a pornographic drawing on the dry erase board on your office door, but that next to this drawing, the person has scrolled the slogan of the rival team. This, this is an ill omen. This could be bad news.


Emma Bolden is the author of How To Recognize A Lady, a chapbook of poems published as part of Edge by Edge, the third in Toadlily Press' Quartet Series, and The Mariner's Wife, a chapbook published by Finishing Line Press. Her third chapbook, The Sad Epistles, is forthcoming from Dancing Girl Press. She was the recipient of a Tennessee Williams Scholarship to the Sewanee Writers' Conference and was named a Finalist for a Ruth Lilly Fellowship by the Poetry Foundation/Poetry magazine. Her work has been published or is forthcoming in such journals as Prairie Schooner, the Indiana Review, Feminist Studies, The Journal, Redivider, The Greensboro Review, and Verse. Her manuscript was a semi-finalist for the Perugia Press Prize. She is a Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Georgetown College, where she also serves as the poetry editor of the Georgetown Review.



9 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 4, 2008 at 1:57 am
mariegauthier
You know I work in Amherst, right? We breathe ED there.
The one ED story I will share: in college (a far humbler one than Amherst College, I can assure you), my dear friend K. & I were going to meet between classes for a quick lunch, but my Irish lit class ran late, and when I came out the door, she held up a bag of Chinese food and exclaimed, “Because I could not stop for Lunch, Lunch kindly stopped for me!”
March 4, 2008 at 2:29 am
emmabolden
YOU WORK IN AMHERST? REALLY? REALLY? I am planning a pilgrimage to MA very soon, and a good deal of it will be spent in Amherst.
That might be the best Dickinson story, ever. I wish that Lunch would kindly stop for me more often!
March 4, 2008 at 11:45 am
mariegauthier
I regret to add that Lunch has not kindly stopped for me since…
March 4, 2008 at 1:28 pm
didyousayhername
To be very shallow: I feel that the undoctored photo is much more attractive. Maybe that’s just me.
I won’t go into how much I loveloveLOVE Stealing the Language, for we’ve had that conversation before! Many times!
I hope you have a wondrous week with all the fabulousness of Dickinson & Whitman, and I am quite jealous that mariegauthier works in Amherst.
March 4, 2008 at 2:55 pm
mariegauthier
In Amherst, and in the bestest independent bookshop ever — can you believe I was able to bring my son to work with me, full-time, for the first 8 months of his life??
Definitely envy-worthy. ;>)
All ED pilgrims end up at our store, Emma, so I will expect you to report there pronto.
March 4, 2008 at 8:52 pm
emmabolden
I wish that a Snack would Stop for me right now.
You do, indeed, work at the best independent bookshop ever — I envy you, too! And, as a good ED pilgrim, I shall have to make an appearance at the store, perhaps after I try to force myself into the room with the fascicles!
March 4, 2008 at 8:53 pm
emmabolden
I wish that a Snack would Stop for me right now.
You do, indeed, work at the best independent bookshop ever — I envy you, too! And, as a good ED pilgrim, I shall have to make an appearance at the store, perhaps after I try to force myself into the room with the fascicles!
March 4, 2008 at 8:55 pm
emmabolden
didyousay (I am going to start using line breaks every time I type your name here) — I also think the undoctored photo is far more attractive. I think they gave her a bad nose job on the doctored photo. I do not approve.
ALICIA SUSKIN OSTRIKER IS MY HERO! OUR HERO! HOORAH! HOORAH!
July 25, 2008 at 11:55 am
Jason Gignac
Well… I guess I’m very late in comments, and besides that, heavily outclassed (the closest I’ve ever come to a class on Dickinson is when we read “I only lost as much but twice” in high school, and all I remember of it is singing it to the tune of ‘The Yellow Rose of Texas’), so be gentle with a poor amateur. But…
I have to ask, do you wonder if Emily Dickinson… wanted some of the ‘aura’ about her, as it was? If it was, not intentional, but allowed, in a way. Now, of course, I suppose it’s probably pretty difficult to tell since all the stories and nonsense that gives birth to the most outward display of the ‘aura’ come from people who were, as it were, huckstering her poems on an unready American public, who may have appreciated tragically beautiful doll-women then dense, troubling verse. I don’t know that Ms Dickinson sat down and said to herself ‘yes, I hope that someday everyone things I’m neurotic, adn that I walked around my house like a living ghost for most of my life in a white dress.’ She probably didn’t.
But I do think PART of the Myth of Emily is intentional. Emily Dickinson could be, quite intentionally, gnomic at times, obtuse, even (I think she even signed a Higginson letter as ‘your Gnome’ didn’t she?). Some of her poetry, similarly has the stamp of, I think Wolff called it in her biography, sort of a ‘hide and seek’ sensibility. Emily Dickinson was not, I imagine, into being remembered as a moon-sotted lunatic that we should all pet and feel sorry for, but I do think she wanted, in some ways, to be… difficult. Distant. Emily did not write down to anyone, she wrote up, and challenged us to climb up to where she was writing. When you succeed, it’s like those age old lips whhisper a secret in your ear. When you fail, they just wear that gnomic smile that she wears in the undoctored photograph, and you even have the feeling that she’s quietly, playfully laughing at you. I don’t think Emily Dickinson stood in Eternity and wept when something like Ancestor’s Brocades came out (unless it’s just because she felt a pang for poor Susie…), I think she just looked at the Todds with with her gnomic little smile, and chuckled to herself.